It is conceivable that it has not passed a farce, implemented by the U.S. government and has been r

Belo Horizonte Brasilia cinema johor bahru Porto Alegre Rio de Janeiro Salvador Sao Paulo Brazil International Health Education Science Culture Planet Palate Incidentally Blogs Most Popular Photos Videos Infographics Topics Horoscope
Every time I post something on BBC about the Moon (eg, this interview with a scientist who believes that the satellite cinema johor bahru has shrunk cinema johor bahru over the past billion years) arise comments questioning the reality of Apollo 11 17 - all of which, except for 13, put men on the surface of the Moon
According to abundant historical documentation, between 1969 and 1972, 12 humans walked the earth satellite, half of whom drove motorized vehicles on the lunar surface. These, nine are still living.
It is conceivable that it has not passed a farce, implemented by the U.S. government and has been relying cinema johor bahru since then, with the complicity not only of the 40 astronauts and thousands and employees connected to the Apollo project, but also historians, journalists and scientists from all over the world, including countries that were once enemies and still are rivals of the United States?
Of course it is. Likewise it is conceivable that a large universal conspiracy to convince us that the earth is round and not flat (as, of course, anyone can see), or to hide the "fact" that the fossil record cinema johor bahru is actually formed by dead animals during the flood of Noah's Ark.
As already well noted mathematician Roger Penrose (and I doubt that he was the first), not everything that the human mind is capable of conceiving, reflects the physical reality. He was talking about mathematical abstractions, but the same applies to conspiracies.
Last year, as part of the celebrations of the four decades of the landing of Armstrong and Aldrin in the Eagle module, prepared a list of questions and answers about the "evidence" that the man would never have been on the moon Unfortunately, I could not give "Ctrl C "-" Ctrl V "in the link to play it in the blog, but the address it is still running and can be accessed here.
Ali, answer questions ranging from the flag that seems to flicker in vacuum malignant Van Allen belts, passing through a series of questions relating to the photographs, as the intensity of the shadows, the lack of stars in the sky and other classics of the lunar denial .
I have no illusion that my quiz go to convince the most fanatical, but I hope that it will help clarify some curious spirit that has, for one reason or another, fallen into the tale of negacionsimo.
A review published in the quiz mentions the fact that the lunar surface is not uniformly white, but has shades of gray. Penitencio me: when I wrote that the lunar surface was "brilliant white", I was condensing a longer argument that is a property of lunar dust reflecting light back to the source, which operates softening the shadows. A complete description can be found in the detailed and definitive debunking of the "lunar fraud" made by Phil Plait in his Bad Astronomy website.
And now, to enliven the weekend, a classic that I remembered to make the history cinema johor bahru of lunar shrinkage math puzzle: according to the hypothesis cinema johor bahru of Thomas Watters, the Moon would have lost 100 meters radius in the last billion years. Suppose, then, that there was a rope tied close around the lunar equator, 1 billion years ago. Today, it is still there, the rope would present a clearance, since the moon shrank. Question: How many feet of rope would be left?
No matter what the original diameter ...
We must remember that the gravitational force is proportional to the square of the distance between the two masses inversamentre within a gravitational constant. I want it influences the outcome ... reply this review report abuse 20/08/2010 - 12:15 Submitted cinema johor bahru by: Marco Fantinato
Dear Alonso: The moon lost 100m of "Ray" and not the "diameter" d = 2r, so d1-d2 = 200 and not 100 The correct answer cinema johor bahru is twice this review report abuse 20/08/2010 cinema johor bahru - 13:48 Posted by: Alonso
I received this week the results of a test, and in the middle of a lot of contalhadas had to calculate cinema johor bahru the length of the circumference and diameter cinema johor bahru wrong just by swapping with lightning! (Messed up the whole question .....)
Excuse my ignorance, but no matter how the initial diameter and the end? If the moon loses its diameter 100m and 628m is less in circumference, the same applies to another body as the earth, for example, which has a much larger circumference? There was missing data for this outcome? reply this review report abuse 22/08/2010 - 22:53 Submitted by: